<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 10 Tips on How to Win a Presidential Debate</title> <atom:link href="http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate</link> <description>Web 2.0, Marketing, Analytics, WordPress SEO</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:43:51 -0600</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Vladimir</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-16325</link> <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-16325</guid> <description>I hope you noticed certain dose of sarcasm in my comments. Proving a sarcastic man wrong is always a good thing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you noticed certain dose of sarcasm in my comments. Proving a sarcastic man wrong is always a good thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: yoyoyo</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-16320</link> <dc:creator>yoyoyo</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-16320</guid> <description>If McCain is so much better than Obama in talking, then how did he lose the election?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If McCain is so much better than Obama in talking, then how did he lose the election?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vladimir</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-12503</link> <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-12503</guid> <description>I still like this article. Obama won at the end and I am glad that some of the points I made do not seem to be that strong in US anymore.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still like this article. Obama won at the end and I am glad that some of the points I made do not seem to be that strong in US anymore.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vladimir</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-6065</link> <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-6065</guid> <description>Thank you very much!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mercime</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-6061</link> <dc:creator>mercime</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-6061</guid> <description>Thank you Vladimir. It was so refreshing to read an intelligent analysis of the debate. I have heard and seen so many nonsensical claims from supposedly professional mainstream journalists who are doing a disservice to their audience. Those journalists should learn about debating from you. Thank you once again. Peace.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Vladimir. It was so refreshing to read an intelligent analysis of the debate. I have heard and seen so many nonsensical claims from supposedly professional mainstream journalists who are doing a disservice to their audience. Those journalists should learn about debating from you. Thank you once again. Peace.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan D.</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5986</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan D.</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5986</guid> <description>Okay, Palin pretty much lost me when she suggested that the U.S. needs to start leading the rest of the world in cleaning up the world. With the obvious exception of China, if she doesn&#039;t understand how much damage the last 8 years have done to the environment, nor have even a vague notion of just how far out of the loop we are in terms of environmental reforms, then I see her as ill-prepared for governance, and or delusional.That said Obama, and his cadre still scare me, so I&#039;ve decided to put my money where my mouth is, and put myself down as a write in. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Palin pretty much lost me when she suggested that the U.S. needs to start leading the rest of the world in cleaning up the world. With the obvious exception of China, if she doesn't understand how much damage the last 8 years have done to the environment, nor have even a vague notion of just how far out of the loop we are in terms of environmental reforms, then I see her as ill-prepared for governance, and or delusional.</p><p>That said Obama, and his cadre still scare me, so I've decided to put my money where my mouth is, and put myself down as a write in. :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rudy</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5971</link> <dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5971</guid> <description>Great analysis.  Are you sure you&#039;re not an American citizen? :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis.  Are you sure you're not an American citizen? :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vladimir</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5969</link> <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5969</guid> <description>Of course, the polls can say who won, I was just expressing my opinion.Vice presidential debate was interesting, I think Biden won that one but very closely. It seemed that candidates were briefed of questions in advance and allowed to take written speeches (they were reading something of the desk obviously).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the polls can say who won, I was just expressing my opinion.</p><p>Vice presidential debate was interesting, I think Biden won that one but very closely. It seemed that candidates were briefed of questions in advance and allowed to take written speeches (they were reading something of the desk obviously).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5964</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5964</guid> <description>hey interresting that you are all wrong polls show on the economy obama had a 56 to 38% edge, and on foreign policy a 52 to 48% edge look at cnn.com poll of polls, which includes very many polls on the same. i think what you need in a debate more importantly is to have a sense of where the public stands on some issue, thn you just align yourself with them and you run away with the debate. i appreciate your comments and i think they are really good observations, but on an issue like iraq its clear what the perception is, the people are mless interested in winning the war, than in stoppimhg the loss of american lives, so mccain aligned himself with the wrong issue. again on the economy, mccains gretaest failing is that he doesnt apply some critical thought before he comes out with a position. obamas greatest failing was that he feels the urge to see both sides of an arguement before explaining his position, which ends up in agreeing too much. however the latter position is more amiable and acceptable to women who are actually responsible for his surge in the debate polls. so vladimir, you are off target</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey interresting that you are all wrong polls show on the economy obama had a 56 to 38% edge, and on foreign policy a 52 to 48% edge look at cnn.com poll of polls, which includes very many polls on the same. i think what you need in a debate more importantly is to have a sense of where the public stands on some issue, thn you just align yourself with them and you run away with the debate. i appreciate your comments and i think they are really good observations, but on an issue like iraq its clear what the perception is, the people are mless interested in winning the war, than in stoppimhg the loss of american lives, so mccain aligned himself with the wrong issue. again on the economy, mccains gretaest failing is that he doesnt apply some critical thought before he comes out with a position. obamas greatest failing was that he feels the urge to see both sides of an arguement before explaining his position, which ends up in agreeing too much. however the latter position is more amiable and acceptable to women who are actually responsible for his surge in the debate polls. so vladimir, you are off target</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5886</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5886</guid> <description>Wow , nothing like politics to spark a great debate , great post Vladimir !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow , nothing like politics to spark a great debate , great post Vladimir !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan D.</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5856</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan D.</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5856</guid> <description>In terms of fairness, I did rewatch the end of the debate again, on hulu.comMcCain just blinks like crazy. I might have been reading a bit too far into it.I still think he attempted to paint much of Obama&#039;s positions out of context, when he knew the context quite well.As far as that is concerned, there seems to me a fine line between doing a poor job at acting, and speaking untruths.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of fairness, I did rewatch the end of the debate again, on hulu.com</p><p>McCain just blinks like crazy. I might have been reading a bit too far into it.</p><p>I still think he attempted to paint much of Obama's positions out of context, when he knew the context quite well.</p><p>As far as that is concerned, there seems to me a fine line between doing a poor job at acting, and speaking untruths.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan D.</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5855</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan D.</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5855</guid> <description>I am not in a position to accuse McCain of specific lies, however as far as I can remember I&#039;ve always hand very good instincts for knowing when someone was lying to themselves, primarily, and If I had to guess I&#039;d say that I was half way decent at picking out when someone is attempting to pull the metaphorical wool over my eyes. It&#039;s the white lies that usually get people because people generally like to think of themselves as honest, so they will often go to extraordinary lengths to make themselves believe something before they make any attempt to make someone else believe something expedient and or convenient to the teller.If you want to read a disturbing, but very informative book on deceit, to include tactics to discern when people are lying based on how they craft their words, then check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://snurl.com/3x4vw  [www_amazon_com]&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quirkology by Dr. Richard Wiseman.&lt;/a&gt; He got his Ph.D. in deceit.There were a few times when I thought McCain was being less than truthful, the one I&#039;ll mention specifically was when McCain accused Obama of not &quot;getting,&quot; Russia&#039;s aggression into Georgia.Excuse me, but unless McCain has had his head buried in the sand, he would know that in terms of taking this controversy from political posturing to to physical violence, Georgia acted first, by bombing, and by attacking Russian peacekeepers.Obama&#039;s comment that &quot;Both sides should show restraint,&quot; was spot on, as we weren&#039;t going to do anything signficant about the situation, and personally, I still doubt we will, and if McCain didn&#039;t truly know that, then I think he should be ruled out for that measure of incompetence alone. I have little doubt he knew what went down between Russia and Georgia, long before we did, and he is sacrificing the truth for political posturing.If we are saying that all is fair in love, war, and politics, then we are saying that it is naive not to expect that he will lie. None of that changes the fact that, if I&#039;m right, he has lied, whether we choose to hold him, or any politician, accountable or not.They were just naive to think that we would come to their rescue. Selling them arms is one thing, but actually using our military, to protect them, well unless they start coming up with the natural resources Iraq has, or the strategic importance Afghanistan has, they will continue to be in a for a rude awakening, unless of course, pipelines start coming into play, as our military shuts down without oil, (as does any significantly sized military on this planet) thus it has become a sort of hungry hippo.Well, here is a link to the other side of the story, as our press for the most part, did not emphasize that Georgia attacked Russian Peacekeepers first. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNw24Il7lZYI think this is a great article explaining much of what could be made better about American foreign policy, much better, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/frank-schaeffer/why-russia-invaded-georgi_b_118344.htmlIt&#039;s just that I don&#039;t agree with his conclusion to support Obama because he is the lesser of two villians (my inference, not his)There was also another spot near the end of of the debate when McCain was blinking like a rabbit in the wind. I didn&#039;t believe his response initially, and then when he started with the blinking, I just tuned him out.If I watch the debate again, which I seriously doubt, as I am not in the habit of making insult to my own injury, I&#039;ll make a not of the time,Finally, a paraphrased quote from the movie Lawrence of Arabia. It was spoken by the French Diplomat near the film&#039;s end. He said the difference between a liar, (such as myself) (still quoting the movie here :) ) and someone that tells half-truths, is that the liar knows what the truth is, but for whatever reason does no speak it, whereas the person who speaks half-truths, has forgotten where they have put the truth entirely. Remember, I said it was a paraphrase.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not in a position to accuse McCain of specific lies, however as far as I can remember I've always hand very good instincts for knowing when someone was lying to themselves, primarily, and If I had to guess I'd say that I was half way decent at picking out when someone is attempting to pull the metaphorical wool over my eyes. It's the white lies that usually get people because people generally like to think of themselves as honest, so they will often go to extraordinary lengths to make themselves believe something before they make any attempt to make someone else believe something expedient and or convenient to the teller.</p><p>If you want to read a disturbing, but very informative book on deceit, to include tactics to discern when people are lying based on how they craft their words, then check out <a
href="http://snurl.com/3x4vw  [www_amazon_com]" rel="nofollow">Quirkology by Dr. Richard Wiseman.</a> He got his Ph.D. in deceit.</p><p>There were a few times when I thought McCain was being less than truthful, the one I'll mention specifically was when McCain accused Obama of not "getting," Russia's aggression into Georgia.</p><p>Excuse me, but unless McCain has had his head buried in the sand, he would know that in terms of taking this controversy from political posturing to to physical violence, Georgia acted first, by bombing, and by attacking Russian peacekeepers.</p><p>Obama's comment that "Both sides should show restraint," was spot on, as we weren't going to do anything signficant about the situation, and personally, I still doubt we will, and if McCain didn't truly know that, then I think he should be ruled out for that measure of incompetence alone. I have little doubt he knew what went down between Russia and Georgia, long before we did, and he is sacrificing the truth for political posturing.</p><p>If we are saying that all is fair in love, war, and politics, then we are saying that it is naive not to expect that he will lie. None of that changes the fact that, if I'm right, he has lied, whether we choose to hold him, or any politician, accountable or not.</p><p>They were just naive to think that we would come to their rescue. Selling them arms is one thing, but actually using our military, to protect them, well unless they start coming up with the natural resources Iraq has, or the strategic importance Afghanistan has, they will continue to be in a for a rude awakening, unless of course, pipelines start coming into play, as our military shuts down without oil, (as does any significantly sized military on this planet) thus it has become a sort of hungry hippo.</p><p>Well, here is a link to the other side of the story, as our press for the most part, did not emphasize that Georgia attacked Russian Peacekeepers first. <a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNw24Il7lZY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNw24Il7lZY</a></p><p>I think this is a great article explaining much of what could be made better about American foreign policy, much better, <a
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/frank-schaeffer/why-russia-invaded-georgi_b_118344.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/frank-schaeffer/why-russia-invaded-georgi_b_118344.html</a></p><p>It's just that I don't agree with his conclusion to support Obama because he is the lesser of two villians (my inference, not his)</p><p>There was also another spot near the end of of the debate when McCain was blinking like a rabbit in the wind. I didn't believe his response initially, and then when he started with the blinking, I just tuned him out.</p><p>If I watch the debate again, which I seriously doubt, as I am not in the habit of making insult to my own injury, I'll make a not of the time,</p><p>Finally, a paraphrased quote from the movie Lawrence of Arabia. It was spoken by the French Diplomat near the film's end. He said the difference between a liar, (such as myself) (still quoting the movie here :) ) and someone that tells half-truths, is that the liar knows what the truth is, but for whatever reason does no speak it, whereas the person who speaks half-truths, has forgotten where they have put the truth entirely. Remember, I said it was a paraphrase.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vladimir</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5848</link> <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5848</guid> <description>Thanks Steph, I tried to stay impartial which my position easily grants me. I do have a preference among the two, but I have listed my real preference at the end of the article.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Steph, I tried to stay impartial which my position easily grants me. I do have a preference among the two, but I have listed my real preference at the end of the article.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spartak</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5844</link> <dc:creator>Spartak</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5844</guid> <description>Moram reci alal vera za presek tj obradu govornika.
Posebno mi je drago sto sam procitao iz prostog razloga sto covek mnogo moze da nauci.
Zaista osvezavajucao obrada politicke scene. Jos jednom, svaka cast
pozdrav</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moram reci alal vera za presek tj obradu govornika.<br
/> Posebno mi je drago sto sam procitao iz prostog razloga sto covek mnogo moze da nauci.<br
/> Zaista osvezavajucao obrada politicke scene. Jos jednom, svaka cast<br
/> pozdrav</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephanie</title><link>http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/debate/comment-page-1#comment-5843</link> <dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator> <pubDate></pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/?p=727#comment-5843</guid> <description>Vladamir - this is a fascinating view on the debate!  I didn&#039;t get to watch it, but have listened to the news reports since then.  Regardless of who you are supporting in the election itself, you have definitely listed the top keys to a successful debate.  I hope Obama comes across better in the future.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vladamir - this is a fascinating view on the debate!  I didn't get to watch it, but have listened to the news reports since then.  Regardless of who you are supporting in the election itself, you have definitely listed the top keys to a successful debate.  I hope Obama comes across better in the future.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: 67.222.145.100 @ 2009-11-21 11:42:40 by W3 Total Cache -->